A review of Western Australia's local government rating framework is under way, with the state government examining whether councils should face tighter constraints on how much they can increase rates each year. The review directly affects every Perth household and business that pays local government rates, which fund everything from rubbish collection and road maintenance to community libraries and aquatic centres.
The timing matters. Across Perth's metropolitan councils, rates notices have climbed steadily over recent years, tracking inflation and the rising cost of delivering services. At the same time, the state government has been navigating its own budget pressures and surpluses driven largely by iron ore royalties, and there is political pressure to show that cost-of-living relief extends beyond state-level measures to the local tier of government. One Nation's decision to contest the upcoming WA byelection, reported on 6 July 2026, signals that cost-of-living frustration remains a live issue for outer suburban and regional voters, many of whom are also ratepayers dealing with higher council bills alongside mortgage and energy costs.
What the review could change for residents
Under the current system, each of Perth's 30-plus metropolitan councils sets its own rate in the dollar annually, subject to approval through a public budget process but without a hard legislative cap on increases. The review is considering whether a cap, modelled loosely on arrangements in Victoria and New South Wales, should be introduced in WA. If a cap were adopted, councils would need state government approval, or a ratepayer vote, to raise rates above a set threshold in any given year.
For residents, that change would work in two directions. On one hand, it could limit unexpected rate increases and give households more certainty when budgeting. On the other hand, policy analysts note that hard rate caps can constrain councils' ability to maintain ageing infrastructure or expand services in growing suburbs, particularly in outer metropolitan areas like the City of Swan, the City of Wanneroo and the City of Armadale, where population growth is placing new demands on local roads, parks and drainage. Residents in those areas could find councils seeking to reduce service levels or defer capital works if revenue growth is capped below the actual cost of delivering services.
The review is also examining how the current concession system for pensioners and seniors works at the local government level. Eligible WA residents already receive a rebate on their annual rates bill through the state government's Rate Rebate scheme, and the review is looking at whether that rebate is adequately calibrated to current property values, which have risen sharply across Perth. If the rebate amount is not adjusted to keep pace with higher unimproved values, the effective cost burden on concession holders grows even when the rate in the dollar stays flat.
What happens next
The Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries is expected to publish findings from the review later in 2026, with any legislative changes requiring Parliament to amend the Local Government Act 1995. Councils have been invited to submit responses to the review, and several metropolitan local governments are understood to have raised concerns about the operational impact of a hard cap, particularly given rising insurance, energy and workforce costs that affect council operations in the same way they affect household budgets.
For Perth residents, the immediate practical step is to check what their own council has proposed in its draft budget for the 2026-27 financial year. Under existing rules, councils must advertise proposed rate increases and allow public submissions before adoption. Residents in the Cities of Vincent, Fremantle, Joondalup and other metropolitan councils have until their respective budget adoption meetings, typically held in June or July each year, to make submissions or appear before council. For those who missed that window in 2026, the review process itself offers a second avenue: public submissions to the state-level review are a direct way to shape what the framework looks like from 2027 onward.