Perth Property Listings Caught Out by Duplicate Image Problem as Buyers Push Back
A surge in copy-paste listing photos is muddying the market for buyers in Perth's tightest suburbs, and agents are being put on notice.
3 min read
A surge in copy-paste listing photos is muddying the market for buyers in Perth's tightest suburbs, and agents are being put on notice.
3 min read

Perth's already strained property market picked up an unwelcome subplot this week when the Real Estate Institute of Western Australia flagged a spike in duplicate listing images circulating across major platforms including realestate.com.au and Domain. Buyers across inner-ring suburbs from Leederville to Victoria Park have reported seeing identical photographs recycled across multiple properties, in some cases showing the same kitchen or bathroom shot attached to addresses several kilometres apart.
The problem is not new, but the scale appears to have accelerated through June. Housing demand in Perth has held at elevated levels through the first half of 2026, driven partly by population growth tied to AUKUS defence-sector relocations to the Henderson and Stirling Naval Base corridors, and partly by sustained migration inflows. That pressure has tightened stock in affordable mid-ring suburbs, and agents competing for listings are cutting corners on photography.
The mechanics are straightforward. When a property management company photographs a renovated rental on, say, Oxford Street in Leederville, those images sometimes end up reused months later for a structurally similar property in East Victoria Park or Cannington without the buyer ever realising the bathroom tiles in the photo belong to a different address. In a market where properties in Perth's inner suburbs have been selling after an average of fewer than 20 days on market for much of 2025 and into 2026, buyers are making fast decisions — sometimes based on a handful of images viewed on a phone screen.
Consumer Protection WA, the state agency that handles property-related complaints under the Real Estate and Business Agents Act 1978, confirmed this week it is aware of concerns about misleading visual representations in residential listings. The agency has not yet announced formal enforcement action, but it directed agents and property managers to the existing obligation under the Australian Consumer Law that prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in trade and commerce. Penalties under those provisions are substantial — up to $50,000 for individuals and $250,000 for bodies corporate under certain circumstances.
REIWA has encouraged buyers to cross-reference listing images using reverse image search tools, a step that takes under a minute and can catch recycled photos before a deposit is paid. The institute's Perth-based offices on Havelock Street in West Perth have handled an unspecified number of member inquiries on the issue during June.
Buyers attending home opens from Subiaco to Morley this weekend are being advised to treat image consistency as a basic due-diligence item alongside building inspections and title searches. If the listing photos look studio-perfect for a property priced at $480,000 in Midland, that alone is worth a second look. The Midland Gate and Malaga corridors — areas seeing strong first-homebuyer activity linked to Metronet's expansion toward the Ellenbrook and Morley-Ellenbrook line — have seen a disproportionate share of budget-tier listings where photography corners are more likely to be cut.
Beyond the immediate buyer risk, there is a regulatory gap worth watching. Australia's Digital ID Act 2024 and various state-level consumer frameworks do not yet specifically address AI-assisted image generation in property listings, a practice that industry observers say is beginning to appear alongside the older problem of duplicate photographs. The distinction matters because a duplicated real photo is at least verifiable through a reverse search, while a generated image of a kitchen that does not exist creates a harder evidentiary problem for regulators.
Consumer Protection WA has a formal complaints lodgement process available online and at its office at Dumas House on Havelock Street. Buyers who believe they have been shown materially misleading images during a sales campaign are advised to document the listing URL, screenshot the images with timestamps, and lodge a complaint before the listing is taken down — which can happen within hours of a sale going unconditional. The agency also liaises with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission on cross-jurisdictional cases involving national portal operators.
Spread the word
About this article
Published by The Daily Perth
Stay in the loop
Daily brief
Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.
The Daily Network — local news across Australia
More local news across Australia